Skip to main content

Regression Testing vs. Sanity Testing: Detailed Explanation with Example

 

Regression testing and sanity testing are both essential software testing techniques, but they serve different purposes in ensuring software stability after modifications.

Regression Testing

Definition: Regression testing is a comprehensive testing approach that ensures recent code changes do not negatively impact the existing functionality of an application. It involves re-running previously executed test cases to verify that the software still works as expected after modifications such as bug fixes, feature additions, or updates.


Key Characteristics:

  • Scope: Covers the entire application.
  • Purpose: Ensures that new changes do not break existing functionality.
  • Execution Time: Time-consuming due to extensive testing.
  • Test Cases: Uses a large set of test cases.
  • Automation: Often automated for efficiency.
  • Depth: In-depth testing of all functionalities.
  • When Used: After major updates, bug fixes, or new features.

Example of Regression Testing

Imagine you have developed an e-commerce website. Initially, you test all functionalities, including:

  • User registration
  • Product search
  • Adding items to the cart
  • Payment processing

Later, you decide to add a new payment method (e.g., cryptocurrency payments). To ensure this addition doesn’t break existing functionalities, you:

  1. Create new test cases for the cryptocurrency payment method.
  2. Re-run all previous test cases to verify that core features (user registration, product search, cart functionality, etc.) still work properly.
  3. If any issues arise, developers fix them before releasing the update.

Sanity Testing

Definition: Sanity testing is a quick and focused testing approach that verifies whether specific changes or bug fixes work correctly before conducting deeper testing. Sanity testing acts as a checkpoint before regression testing, ensuring that the build is stable enough for further testing. If sanity testing fails, regression testing is postponed until the issues are resolved.

 

Key Characteristics:

  • Scope: Focuses on a few critical functionalities.
  • Purpose: Verifies that specific changes work correctly before deeper testing.
  • Execution Time: Quick and limited testing.
  • Test Cases: Uses a minimal set of test cases.
  • Automation: Usually performed manually.
  • Depth: Surface-level testing of key areas.
  • When Used: After minor changes or bug fixes.

Example of Sanity Testing

Consider the same e-commerce website. Suppose a bug was reported where users were unable to apply discount coupons during checkout. The development team fixes the issue, and before running a full regression test, they:

  1. Perform sanity testing by checking whether the discount coupon functionality now works correctly.
  2. Verify that the checkout process is not affected.
  3. If sanity testing passes, they proceed with full regression testing.


Key Differences Between Regression and Sanity Testing

Aspect Regression Testing Sanity Testing
Purpose Ensures that recent changes do not break existing functionality Verifies that specific changes work correctly before deeper testing
Scope Covers the entire application Focuses on a few critical functionalities
Execution Time Time-consuming due to extensive testing Quick and limited testing
Test Cases Uses a large set of test cases Uses a minimal set of test cases
Automation Often automated for efficiency Usually performed manually
Depth In-depth testing of all functionalities Surface-level testing of key areas
When Used After major updates, bug fixes, or new features After minor changes or bug fixes

 

Conclusion

Sanity testing acts as a checkpoint before regression testing, ensuring that the build is stable enough for further testing. If sanity testing fails, regression testing is postponed until the issues are resolved.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is an SDET? – Roles, Responsibilities, and Career Path

Introduction The field of software testing has evolved significantly, and with the rise of automation, the Software Development Engineer in Test (SDET) role has become crucial. SDETs are technical testers with strong programming skills who ensure software quality through test automation and continuous integration. But what does an SDET really do? Let’s dive in.   Key Responsibilities of an SDET An SDET wears multiple hats—part developer, part tester, and part automation engineer. Their primary responsibilities include: Developing test automation frameworks for functional and regression testing. Writing automated test scripts to validate application functionality. Collaborating with developers to ensure testability of code. Implementing CI/CD pipelines with automated testing for continuous deployment. Conducting performance, security, and API testing to enhance software robustness. Required Skills for an SDET To excel as an SDET, you need a mix of technical and so...
2 comments
Read more

Keys.RETURN vs Keys.ENTER in Selenium: Are They Really the Same?

When you're automating keyboard interactions with Selenium WebDriver, you're bound to encounter both Keys.RETURN and Keys.ENTER . At a glance, they might seem identical—and in many cases, they behave that way too. But under the hood, there’s a subtle, nerdy distinction that can make all the difference when fine-tuning your test scripts. In this post, we’ll break down these two key constants, when to use which, and why understanding the difference (even if minor) might give you an edge in crafting more accurate and resilient automation. 🎹 The Subtle Difference On a standard physical keyboard, there are typically two keys that look like Enter: Enter key on the numeric keypad. Return key on the main keyboard (near the letters). Historically: Keys.RETURN refers to the Return key . Keys.ENTER refers to the Enter key . That’s right—the distinction comes from old-school typewriters and legacy keyboard design. Return meant returning the carriage to the beginning ...
Post a Comment
Read more